Search for: "Shield Defense Systems, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 4:16 pm
Much to my surprise, the Federal Trade Commission appears to be taking action against Pre-Paid Legal Services (NYSE:PPD) for making misleading representations in connection with its Identity Theft Shield and Affirmative Defense Response System products. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
They deserve as much protection as the information that belongs […] The post Shields up: Prepare your Cyberdefenses, PIA Magazine, by Marc S. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am by Brian A. Comer
   More specifically, the 2009 Toyota Camry's supplemental restraint system included a curtain shield airbag ("CSA"). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
By Jason Rantanen, Visiting Scholar at UC Hastings School of Law Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 8:19 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In particular, this article suggests that a good faith belief that the induced acts are not infringing, which remains as a defense, should only act as a shield against past damages and not against prospective relief such as injunctions or ongoing royalties. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
., Inc. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 564, a product liability  decision generally considered to be quite pro-defense. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Raymond Millien
STMicroelectronics Inc., NPEs often file law suits first and then attempt to negotiate a license with the accused infringer/defendant. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:51 am by Woodrow Pollack
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Case No. 8:12-cv-826 (M.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System (discussed here), the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:31 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Fells Acres Day Sch., Inc., 408 Mass. 393 (1990)), which held that intended harm can be inferred from the very nature of the act. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:30 am by John Jascob
It would also be premature to rule on the four CD&R directors’ defense that they could not be liable because they recused themselves and abstained from voting. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Anti-discrimination law does not extend so far as to shield a disabled employee from the implementation of his employer’s standard policies against employee misconduct. [read post]